Roomed vs RentBetter

Find a tenant and self-manage online, built for Australia.

Feature comparison of Roomed and RentBetter
FeatureRoomedRentBetter
Made forAustralian self-managed landlordsAustralian self-managed landlords
Rent by the roomYesEach room needs its own subscription
Rent collectionYesYes
Automatic rent matchingPartly: For rent Roomed collectsPartly: On-platform direct debits only
Bond trackingYesPartly: Collection from tenants
Overdue rent alertsYesPartly: Email reminders
PlatformiOS appWeb only
Advertising and tenant checksNoYes
Expense and tax reportsNoYes
Free tierYesNo
PriceFree. 1.5% per payment when Roomed collects the rent (2.5% by card)A$29 to A$36 a month for each property

Where Roomed is stronger

  • Rooms live under one property. RentBetter allows one active tenancy per property, so a room-by-room house means setting up each room as its own property, each with its own subscription.
  • No monthly fee. Roomed is free to track with, and when it collects the rent the fee is 1.5% of each payment (2.5% by card). RentBetter charges A$29 to A$36 a month for every property, whether or not rent moves.
  • A native iOS app with push notifications the moment rent falls overdue. RentBetter is web only.
  • Free to use for tracking. RentBetter has no free tier.

Where RentBetter is stronger

  • Advertising on realestate.com.au, Domain and Rent.com.au, which Roomed does not do at all.
  • Tenant checks, digital state-specific lease agreements and condition reports.
  • Direct debit rent collection with automatic retries, useful if you want the platform to move the money rather than watch it.

RentBetter and Roomed are both built for Australian self-managers, and RentBetter is the stronger choice for finding a tenant. Once the tenant is in, the economics diverge: RentBetter charges per property and treats every room as a separate one, where Roomed tracks the whole portfolio, room by room, for free.

See how Roomed compares to every alternative